Thursday, 12 November 2015

3 Biggest Concerns for Chelsea's Fans in 2015/16 Season so Far

3 Biggest Concerns for Chelsea's Fans in 2015/16 Season so Far
IAN KINGTON/Getty Images 

I know what you’re thinking. Only three?
Chelsea’s 2015/16 campaign continues to lurch from one crisis to another, with the solace of the international break saving the club’s fans from more misery for a couple of weeks at least.
Placed 16th in the table, just three points off the relegation zone, the reigning champions are breaking all kinds of unwanted records as they continue to sink without a trace.
Of their many star players, arguably only Willian has lived up to his billing during this miserable opening third to the campaign, but what about the wider problems?
Here’s a look at a trio of them.

Jose Mourinho Has Gone Rogue
Clive Rose/Getty Images
In coming to resemble Michael Douglas’ stressed-out character William "D-Fens" Foster in the 1993 film Falling DownJose Mourinho has eroded much of the respect he’s built up over the years. We always knew that he was a relentless winner and admired him for it, but now he just seems a bit frantic.
Referees, opposing managers and even his own medical staff have been in the firing line. The support Chelsea fans have shown for the man who has won three of their five league titles has been admirable, but even they can’t be surprised that there isn’t much sympathy for the Portuguese elsewhere.
Mourinho seems to regard his club’s current struggles as a personal affront to him, thereby clouding his judgement and his ability to motivate his players.
Until he realises that this isn’t all about him, then you get the sense that Chelsea won’t get out of their malaise.

They’ve Lost Their Spirit
The four defeats in their last five Premier League games perfectly capture the lack of fighting spirit among the Chelsea players right now.
In the home games with Southampton and Liverpool, the Blues took the lead within the first 10 minutes—something which, had it happened last season, would almost certainly have led to a gritty, ground-out win perhaps garnished with a late goal.
On both occasions, though, Mourinho’s side—perhaps nervous—sat back and allowed their opponents both time on the ball and a way back into the match, with crucial goals coming just before half-time from Southampton’s Steven Davis and Liverpool’s Philippe Coutinho.
IAN KINGTON/Getty Images
Deflated and devastated by the loss of their lead, Chelsea went on to concede twice in each second half against the Saints and the Reds, something which would have been unheard of last season and just underlined the club’s fall from grace.
In the two away losses during this nightmare five-game run, the Blues conceded the first goal to West Ham and Stoke and were unable to recover.
In fairness, they were more than a little unfortunate in both matches—with Cesc Fabregas seeing a marginal offside call go against him at Upton Park, and the loss at Stoke coming despite a largely promising performance.
However, a lack of discipline also played its part—see Nemanja Matic’s foolish red card at West Ham—and they came to resemble a side full of individuals unable to work out how best to get back into the contest.
They’re losing from all angles, in other words.

What Will Roman Abramovich Do If There’s No Champions League?
Clive Rose/Getty Images
Roman Abramovich isn’t a man used to being told that he can’t have something, and woe betide whoever has to tell the Russian oligarch that his Chelsea side won’t be a part of the Champions League next season at this rate.
It isn’t the glitz, glamour or Champions League anthem thatAbramovich will miss most, of course—he isn’t a regular attendee at matches anyway—but the rather cold, hard cash which Europe’s premier competition generates, and the subsequent hole it will leave in his sizeable wallet.
Obviously, a club with the vast resources that Chelsea enjoy won’t find themselves out of pocket for too long, but the difference on the balance sheets of clubs who aren’t in the competition and those that are isn’t negligible, and Abramovich will know that.
The worry for Chelsea fans would be that he’d react by, perhaps, sacking Mourinho or maybe selling off a star player to cover for the loss, but the key thing is that we don’t really know what he’d do.
Still as secretive today as he was when he arrived in 2003, Abramovichwould be placed into a situation that he has no experience of and certainly wouldn’t want to be in again.
How he reacts could determine Chelsea’s future.

Monday, 5 October 2015

Premier League Hangover: Rodgers Bids Farewell, Jose Loses It, Arsenal Run Riot

Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse more stories
Premier League Hangover: Rodgers Bids Farewell, Jose Loses It, Arsenal Run Riot
Associated Press
The Merseyside derby proved to be Brendan Rodgers' swan song at Liverpool.
Just when it was getting interesting along comes an international break. An intermission in Premier League proceedings is usually a period for quiet reflection, a time to gather one’s breath, to take a drink safe in the knowledge the kids are at their grandparents.
Clearly this season’s scriptwriters have a darker sense of humour after a weekend in which Dick Advocaat saved Brendan Rodgers the ignominy of being the first managerial casualty of the season, if only by a matter of hours, Sergio Aguero recorded a five-goal haul in the space of 20 minutes, Arsenal obliterated Manchester United in the same time period, Crystal Palace and Leicester City moved to within three points of the summit, and Jose Mourinho went on a rant he might just have finished by the time his players return from international duty.
Where better to begin then than the scene of Rodgers’ coup de grace, Goodison Park. Sunday’s largely uninspired 1-1 draw was the sixth time in seven matches Liverpool and Everton have shared the spoils. The result had become a footnote within an hour of the final whistle. Liverpool smiling assassin chief executive officer Ian Ayre (below) at least had the decency to dress according to the occasion, decked out as he was in full funeral regalia as he took his seat in the stand. 
Rodgers proved remarkably prescient in his post-match press conference, via the Guardian, as he spoke of the need for the club to embark on a rebuilding mission: "whether that is with me or someone else in the job". When a man who has a giant portrait of himself hanging in his home starts to show self-doubt, it's time to tell the portly lady singing outside Anfield that her work there is done. 
While he also reiterated how he felt safe in his job, there was little doubt that this was the rhetoric of a dead man walking. A day earlier Mourinho may have been more mad man talking, yet in delivering his sermon with a steely-eyed conviction usually reserved for people shouting in car parks, he at least gave the impression he'd prise a salmon from the jaws of a mountain bear to keep his position atChelsea. Either that or he'd talk it into a coma. 
The timing of the announcement suggests the Fenway Sports Group had already made up their mind to dispense with Rodgers ahead of the international break, regardless of the result at Goodison.
There was nothing in Liverpool's performance at Everton to suggest his players had stopped playing for him, but likewise there was equally scant indication they possess enough collective quality to obtain the minimum requirement of a Champions League place come May. Failure to beat Norwich, Carlisle and FC Sion at home has not sat well with FSG, yet it is performances away from Anfield that have been even more alarming.
Sunday's draw means Liverpool have now won just once in ten games on their travels.
Rare is it that a manager loses his job on the back of a six-match unbeaten run. Five of those six matches were 1-1 draws though, so it's hardly a golden return on the £80 million that Liverpool spent over the summer on new players. Heavy reinvestment of the cash generated by Raheem Sterling's sale took Rodgers' spending to almost £300 million since he joined the club from Swansea City in June 2012.
How much of that £300 million was spent on players of Rodgers' design alone is open to conjecture. The shadowy transfer committee at Anfield will forever cast doubt on whether it was a case of "live by the sword, die by (someone else's) the sword." Like so many facets of the 42-year-old's tenure, there is no straightforward answer.
Whichever way you cut it though, he's been given more time and money than most to realise his vision. Even taking into account the untimely departures of Luis SuarezSteven Gerrard and Sterling as mitigating factors, few will have watched Liverpool this season and feared "death by football" (h/t Daily Mail). The primary philosophy earmarked for his project upon striding through the Shankly Gates three years ago has been responsible for few known casualties.

Are Liverpool right to sack Brendan Rodgers?

SUBMIT VOTE vote to see results
The 2012 fly-on-the-wall documentary Being: Liverpool remains his nadir. That said it's not hard to imagine him watching it back on DVD when he's got the house to himself and being quietly pleased with how he comes across. Expect the envelope test to resurface at wherever he pitches up next.
It is Rodgers' acute verbosity that makes it easy to forget he came closer to winning the league for Liverpool than either Gerard Houllier (seven points behind Arsenal in 2001) or Rafa Benitez (four points off Manchester United in 2009) managed before him. This is a manager who took Liverpool to within one win of the Premier League title in 2013/2014. 
And for that reason alone he almost certainly doesn't deserve it to be cast as a parody of himself, shuffling out the back door at Anfield with a book of Shankly quotes and a Modern Management manual under his arm. He might not be as good a coach as he thinks he is, but he's almost certainly better than many give him credit for. 

Reports: Mourinho still answering first question
Frank Augstein/Associated Press
It was a remarkable outburst that greeted Chelsea's loss, even by Mourinho standards.
It was like a soliloquy stolen from Macbeth. For seven-and-a-half unbroken minutes Jose Mourinho answered a single question from Sky Sports as if unaware there was an audience on the other side of camera. It was the type of performance that is usually afforded a stage and spotlight; candid to the point it seemed almost intrusive to watch.
Mourinho’s unsolicited outburst in the aftermath of his side’s turgid 3-1 defeat to Southampton was a persecution complex unraveled live on air.
It made for gripping television as paranoia dripped from his every word, a reservoir of self-righteousness pooling by his feet. Referees as a collective were accused of being afraid to give Chelsea decisions, his players’ mental strength not so much questioned as eviscerated, before Roman Abramovich was publicly challenged to sack him. If it was a dagger he saw before him, Mourinho was in grave danger of slitting his own throat.
Indeed it was a diatribe so discursive in its subject matter, rattled off without missing a beat, it was hard to belief it was all off the cuff. Exasperation at referee Robert Madley’s failure to award Radamel Falcao a penalty at 1-1 was a hollow complaint given Southampton had two legitimate appeals of their own rejected. A fanciful conspiracy theory will almost certainly see him charged and fined by the Football Association, but as a diversionary tactic to take the glare off his overwrought players, it was so far, so Mourinho.
"I think it's time to be a little bit honest and to say clearly the referees are afraid to give decisions for Chelsea," he told Sky Sports, relayed viathe Independent.
"The result was 1-1 when it was a huge penalty, and, once more, we didn't get one. And, I repeat, if the FA wants to punish me, they can punish me. They don't punish other managers, they punish me, but it's not a problem for me."
Mourinho is of course no stranger to courting controversy, but that’s precisely the point. He courts what he wants and rolls his eyes at that which he can do without. Even in a crisis, and that's what Chelsea are in having lost half of their league matches in what is the worst start to a season in 37 years, what followed seemed to be brinkmanship to the point of self-sabotage. 
Below documents Mourinho surmising his points, but there was not a word wasted during his screen time. You could stick a pin at random into a transcript of the interview (h/t the Independent) and almost certainly land on a line worthy of a back page lead. 
"I want to make it clear. One, I don't run away.
"Two, if the club wants to sack me, they have to sack me because I'm not running away from my responsibility and my team. To be champions will obviously be very, very difficult because the distance is considerable, but I am more than convinced that we will finish in the top four. And, when the season is so bad, if you finish top four, it is ok.
"Three, even more important than the first and the second, I think this is a crucial moment in the history of this club. Do you know why? Because if the club sacks me, they sack the best manager that this club has, and secondly, the message is again: bad results and the manager is guilty."
Mourinho has now lost five of his last 10 Premier League matches, before that he had lost five of the previous 59. Abramovich was at Stamford Bridge on Saturday sat in the Gods of the West Stand and while according to the Daily Mail he was disgruntled enough to call a board meeting after the game, there is reportedly no immediate chance of Mourinho being relieved of his duties.
He's not a man known for his patience though and it seems unlikely he will have enjoyed Mourinho's post-match performance any more than he did his team's capitulation to an admittedly excellent Southampton side.  
Self-doubt is rampant in this Chelsea side and it appears now to have spread to the manager too. If it reaches the owner before results improve, it won't just be Liverpool on the lookout for a new coach.

Super Sunday for Wenger and Arsenal
Catherine Ivill - AMA/Getty Images
Alexis Sanchez put in a superlative display as Arsenal swept aside Manchester United.
On any other weekend, in any other season, Arsenal's luxurious demolition job on Manchester United would lead this column.
In an opening 20 minutes that will forever now be stitched into the Premier League's rich tapestry, Arsenal's forwards tore into their opponents with a physicality that was matched with a touch so dexterous it was as though they were driving tanks wearing silk pyjamas. Mesut Ozil could have played in a white smoking jacket, while sporting a monocle. 
As an attacking triumvirate Alexis Sanchez, Theo Walcott and Ozil were as perfect as Wayne RooneyMichael Carrick and Bastian Schweinsteiger were pedestrian as a midfield trio. In no area of the field could United match their hosts, and that extended to the dugout too where Louis Van Gaal endured an afternoon very much to forget. Arsene Wenger's spiky denouncement of boring journalist questions in Friday's press conference, reported via the Telegraph, felt less prickly and more pertinent with each passing minute. 
Van Gaal's instruction to Schweinsteiger to hunt Santi Cazorla deep was an unmitigated disaster. The German is still in north London now looking for the Spaniard. Why Rooney wasn't asked to stand on the toes of Arsenal's conductor-in-chief will go down as one of life's great mysteries, with Schweinsteiger's laboured pressing upfield leaving acres in behind him to which Arsenal exploited with a ruthless efficiency that so often evades them.
Sanchez's improvised first, a Cruyff-like flick at the near post from Ozil's clever cutback would have had the Dutch master on his feet applauding its execution. It was a thing of rare beauty and Arsenal's second just 33 seconds later, in both its conception and conclusion, was in its own way equally as exquisite.
A touch from Sanchez that was so stylish it deserved its own catwalk gave Ozil possession and after he played in Walcott, the England man showed an appreciation of what was going on around him that at times has been his Achilles heel when operating through the middle. A perfectly weighted ball rolled back to Ozil was dispatched into the bottom left corner from just inside the box with only seven minutes on the clock. 
Matteo Darmian failed to reappear for the second half and in truth, it wouldn't have been cruel had he been replaced on 20 minutes after Sanchez's second, a missile of a strike, gave Arsenal an unassailable three-goal lead. Allowing the Chilean to cut inside onto his right foot is nothing less than criminal for an international class defender. 

Are we all agreed Mesut Ozil is pretty good?

SUBMIT VOTE vote to see results
In the second half Arsenal were content to sit deep and pick off their visitors on the counter-attack. United dominated possession in spells but it was largely sterile, as Arsenal conjured just as many chances, and went closest to threatening the scoreline when Alex Oxlaide-Chamberlain struck the bar with a lovely dinked effort in injury-time. 
Watching Rooney pick up a booking for the clunkiest of fouls on Ozil after he'd been exiled to the left wing, recalled the effervescent schemer leaving leaving Gareth Barry for dead in Bloemfontein for Germany's fourth goal against England at the 2010 World Cup.
Rooney's form is diminished to the point few would argue it would not be a case of being cruel to be kind were Van Gaal to pull him out of the firing line.

Five-star Aguero sends City back to the summit
Jon Super/Associated Press/Associated Press
Is there a better player in the Premier League than this man?
On any other weekend, in any other season, Sergio Aguero's five goals forManchester City in 20 remarkable minutes either side of half-time in their 6-1 defeat of Newcastle United, would lead this column.

Friday, 2 October 2015

What Has Happened to the Premier League in Europe?

What Has Happened to the Premier League in Europe?
Shaun Botterill/Getty Images 

Whether or not your particular club is viewed in commensurate esteem, the Premier League's massive reputation has ballooned to indecent levels in recent seasons—all of which flattering to deceive, none of which close to accurate.
Entertainment and proficiency are not necessarily relatives. One can exist without the mastery of the other, and English football's popularity—despite the influx of foreign players—is not predicated on technique, rather fury.
The hustle and bustle of Premier League football reminds of the Wild West. England's top flight has a lawless, gunslinging, cowboy element. It makes for an entertaining product and the most popular domestic sporting competition on Earth.
Ian Walton/Getty Images
The EPL is box office, but it has certainly become an overrated footballing league.
Gunslingers, however, tend to get shot.
Since 2010, the Premier League's European stock as taken a massive hit.
The 2007/08 Champions League final was an all-English affair between Manchester United and Chelsea, with the Red Devils beating Avram Grant's men on penalties.
One season later, a rematch was on the cards until Barcelona's stoppage-time goal at Stamford Bridge (courtesy of Andres Iniesta) knocked the west Londoners out in controversial fashion. United met the Catalan giants in the 2008/09 Champions League final, but Sir Alex Ferguson was denied back-to-back titles, losing 2-0.
Shaun Botterill/Getty Images
England last dominated European football in the late 2000s. Since, everything earned has been exceptionally difficult.
Since the 2010s, only one club has come close to upholding the reputation from which the entire Premier League benefits. Chelsea have played in three semi-finals and won the Champions League in 2011/12, followed by the 2012/13 Europa League. Only once has another English club reached a semi-final (in either competition) past 2009/10.
It has all gotten a bit ridiculous. Chelsea and Manchester United have become English football's version of Atlas, holding the league's heavy reputation on their backs.
What happens, though, when Atlas sneezes?
When previous pillars of European success find themselves struggling, the entire league takes a hit. Pitch in serial underachievers Arsenal, Manchester City, Liverpool and/or Tottenham Hotspur, and the table for mediocrity is set.
JOHN MACDOUGALL/Getty Images
Barca, Bayern, Real: Minimal domestic competition plus the world's best talent equals European success.
An argument suggests having several excellent clubs in one's league helps improve the overall product, which should translate to European success. This assumption ignores reality; parity is an overrated trait in establishing world-beating squads.
Barcelona, Real Madrid and Bayern Munich are Europe's top-three clubs; the La Liga duo primarily battle themselves and Bayern normally enjoy a Bundesliga all their own. Their respective squads are built to crush domestic competition—thereby maximising confidence and rest, which translates to European success.
England suffers from the opposite effect. The top teams are generally evenly matched; hence they proceed to beat each other into submission for nine months—leaving little in the tank for continental duty.
Potentially more damning than competition has been tactical naivety.
PAUL ELLIS/Getty Images
Arsenal, Manchester City and others find altering their methods off winning a challenge when thrust into Europe.
Whether Arsenal, Manchester City or [insert whichever club], they have suffered from an inability to read situations, change styles to suit their opposition and have met the consequences.
Arsene Wenger's Arsenal, for example, have played the same way for the past decade. Whether vs. Reading, Monaco, Chelsea or Bayern Munich, the north Londoners have employed a free-flowing style, mixed with the occasional counter-attack.
The notion is absurd. You cannot play the same way against Swindon Town and Bayern Munich, then expect positive results against the latter—variance must apply.
Gunslinging football pays dividends in England. The pace and power of the EPL lends itself to earning points, as one's opposition normally has the same theory. When displayed in Europe, however, over-aggression can be considered a weakness. Continental clubs often possess the technical precision to open up Premier League sides, exposing the rough-and-tumble nature of their football.
Catherine Ivill - AMA/Getty Images
The European game slows down and becomes more a thinking man's game; England must change accordingly.
Looking past cycles and tactics, European competitions are invariably luck-driven.
When Liverpool won the Champions League in 2004/05, they finished fifth in the Premier League; when Chelsea won the competition in 2011/12, they finished sixth.
A team starting Jose Bosingwa, Ryan Bertrand, John Obi Mikel, an injured David Luiz and an injured Gary Cahill beat Bayern on their own pitch for a European cup, and a Reds' outfit losing 3-0 to then-vaunted AC Milan at half-time came back and won a final—these happenings are rooted in chance.
The puzzle's final piece is managers having more incentive to prioritise Premier League play—as it bleeds further into job security.
Dean Mouhtaropoulos/Getty Images
Liverpool sat their best XI vs. Real Madrid to face Chelsea last season. This shows the priority for most managers.
Getting ousted prematurely from one's Champions or Europa League campaign is infinitely better than woeful domestic performances over the course of 38 fixtures. In other words: The competition with the most money at stake takes precedence.
Reasons for the Premier League's European slump are varied and differ from club to club. The combination of factors, though, remain consistent: Complacency, competition, arrogance, tactical naivety and/or the pursuit of money.
When these items receive direct, en masse attention from clubs, their managers and the English Football Association/Premier League (whose scheduling does little favours when compared elsewhere), tides should change—but never beforehand
.Source: http://bleacherreport.com/